User:全瑕五百出/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Aswan
 * Article Evaluation
 * The leading section includes a sentence that concisely and precisely concludes what Aswan is. It has a chart that can lead readers to every part of the article. However, the leading section mention Aswan is part of UNESCO Creative Cities Network, which is not mentioned in the article. Overall, the leading section is quite concise. Its content is highly relative to the topic, and also up-to-date, with the latest source published in 2021. However, since the city is too historical, there is not much content about the modern Aswan. For example, its current population, its medical condition, or its economy. The article is in neutral tone, without biased language or statement. It does not try to convince readers about any statements about Aswan, and there is no viewpoints in the article.  Most of the reference links still work, but some of them is not found. The resources it used is reliable, and approximately half of them is current.  The article is well-written and well-organized. It does not have any grammatical mistakes, but has two spelling errors.  There are great amount of images in the article, they enhance readers’ understanding. All of them are well-captioned, and are visually appealing.  The talk page only has one conversation regarding the inaccurate climate data. The article is in 7 WikiProjects, rated from low-importance to high-importance.  The article’s overall status is active, its strengths is in the introduction of the city’s history, and also its beautiful image display. The article can be improved in its modern development part, and also the affect of Aswan Dam to the city. Overall, I would assess the article as well-developed.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Aswan Dam
 * Article Evaluation
 * The leading section includes a sentence that concisely summarize the article, and clearly described what Aswan Dam is. There is also clear and helpful guide to every part of the article. However, the leading section is overly detailed, including information such as the affect of the dam, which should be put later in the article. The content is very thorough and highly relevant to the topic. The content is up-to-date, with the latest resource published in 2020. However, the content in the article does not require high timeliness. The article is quite neutral, no claims are heavily biased toward one position. The affect part talk both on the positive and negative influence, which is objective.  The source is not up-to-date, and many of the links have expired. Some of the resources are reliable source, some are just other entries of Wikipedia.  The article is easy to read, well-organized, and no grammatical or spelling error occurred.  There is great amount of images in the article. They are very helpful to reader, and are all well-captioned. Although some is not visually appealing, it is not a major concern.  There are many conversations in talk page, including accusation of an editor hiding the truth about the chief engineer of the dam out of envy. There are also argues about the dam’s benefit and problems, discussions about better organization, and the affect of the dam. The article is included in three WikiProjects, rated Low-importance, High-importance, and Top-importance.  The article’s overall status is active. Its strength is in analyzing the dam’s effect, from both sides, objectively. There is not many flaws in the article, but it can certainly be improved if the resource links are updated. Overall, the article is well-developed.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Petra
 * Article Evaluation
 * The leading section has a sentence that concisely summarized what Petra is. It also briefly introduces the structure of the article. However, the leading section is over-detailed, including too much information about Nabatean people and Nabatean empire. The content is highly relevant to the topic, and has a great timeliness. The article is neutral, without any viewpoints. And it does not try to persuade readers in any way.  The article is supported by reliable, thorough sources. Timeliness is not important to this topic, so many of the sources are not up-to-date. Noticeably, most of the links work well.  The article is well-written and well-organized. There are no grammatical errors, but there are approximately 10 spelling mistakes.  The article has many images that is visually appealing and enhance readers’ understanding. They are all well-captioned.  There are great amount of conversations in the talk page. Topics are from its location, to its real name; from its architecture style, to its unsustainable tourism. The article is included in 9 WikiProjects, with 2 High-importance and 2 Top-importance.  Overall, the article is actively edited, its strengths are the descriptions of the city, and introduction of the history. There are no major flaws, but it can be improved if the leading section is more concise, more relevant, and the major part includes more about tourism. Overall, I would assess the article as well-developed.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources