User:全瑕五百出/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Xiamen Shuangshi High School

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is about my high school, which I am deeply connected with. I want to evaluate it and see if there is room for improvement. My preliminary impression on the article is it is thorough in history. However, it did not cover the newest update of the school, and missing some aspects such as the school's song, campus structure, faculties......

Evaluate the article
The lead section briefly introduced what "Xiamen Shuangshi High School"is, its origin, its components, and its location. However, the location is not presented in the article. It is too concise as well, an introduction of a school should also include its size and its awards.

The content is well relevant to the topic, but is not up-to-date. The school now has three campuses, not two. Some important content is also missing. Such as the number of students and faculties, its principle, and many awards it won.

The article is in neutral tone, there is no viewpoints presented in the article, and it did not attempt to persuade readers. (No expressions such as "it is the best school in the city")

One of the three links provided did not work. The sources is not up-to-date as well. The most current one is from 14 years ago. The school's website will be a better source to gain many informations.

The article is well organized, and is both clear and easy to understand. There was no grammatical errors.

There is only two pictures, the school's logo, and a picture of its origin campus, only the later one enhanced readers' understanding. The logo picture is not updated, it is misleading, and without caption.

There was only one talk, about the external links the editor added, so no conversations existed. It is within the WikiProject China, but is rated as start-class and low-importance.

The article's overall status is not well, its latest update is nine months ago. The information is not up-to-date, which indicates the article has not been thoroughly reviewed and revised in a long time. However, the introduction on the history is done very well. It covered the school's tough but great history. There is still great room of improvement. Most importantly, all informations should be updated. Some important factors of a school should be added as well. Lastly, I would assess the article poorly-developed.