User:다코타/User:dtab2/sandbox/다코타 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) --> Danna
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Dtab2/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? --> The updates reflect new information that has come to light about the idol.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? --> Yes it does
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? --> It does not
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? --> Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? --> The lead is concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? --> Yes the content is relevant to the topic
 * Is the content added up-to-date? --> Yes the content is up-to-date
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? --> No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes its neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? --> No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? --> No, no viewpoints are over or underrepresented
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? --> No, it presents a neutral position

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? --> The source seems reliable
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? --> They do reflect the topic
 * Are the sources current? --> Yes they are current
 * Check a few links. Do they work? --> Yes the link works

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? --> Yes it is and it is well organized
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? --> No issues
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? --> Yes well organized

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? --> There are no images
 * Are images well-captioned? --> No captions because there are no images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? --> No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? --> No images

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? --> No, only one source at the moment.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? --> Only one resource
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? --> No it does not
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? --> Yes there are links to other articles

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? --> The article has added for information about an idol
 * What are the strengths of the content added? --> The strengths of the content are the relevant information in it
 * How can the content added be improved? --> More information about the idol's life