User:005926215jrc/User:KatlynnT/Quique Rivera/005926215jrc Peer Review

General info
User: KatlynnT
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:KatlynnT/Quique Rivera


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:KatlynnT/Quique Rivera

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the articles major sections? - At the moment there is no Lead. I am not sure if you are still working on it or just forgot. Remember to write a draft and don't forget!

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - The content added so far is very good, but you should remove the sentence from Education section saying the school your artist went to is the same as other famous people such as Tim Burton, it's interesting but irrelevant to the topic. Also remove the sentence in Collections where you say he does not have works on display in galleries. Other than those two sections everything looks good.
 * Is the content up to date? - Yes, all the content is up to date. All of the cited sources are from the 2000s.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - All the content is there the only thing missing is a Lead. All the content included is relevant to the artist. The only thing is I suggest to refer to the artist as Rivera instead of by his nickname Quique.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topic? - Yes this article does deal with equity gaps. The article is about a Latinx man working in the animation field which underrepresents POC.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes all the content is said in a neutral tone and there are no opinions or arguments made.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - If possible maybe add what influences Rivera's artwork. If possible include if his ethnic background influences his work or other artists. Maybe include artistic background?

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes all the information was found on reliable secondary sources.
 * Are the sources current? - Yes, the sources are current, they were taken from the 2000s.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - Yes, the information taken reflects what the cited sources say (paraphrased in own words) and reflect the topic. Some use of citing sources is confusing. For example, taken from the sandbox: "Quique has also received multiple nominations and honorable mentions, the most notable of which being the nomination of his film "Así de grandes son las ideas" for a Latin Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video." has two citations at the end so it is confusing which info is from which source, you should break it up to properly. You also do this two other times in the "Biography" in the last sentence and in "Honors and Awards" when you list other awards. I suggest to make a table for the awards and put a citation on where you found the information for said awards. In the bibliography you should properly cite those sources as well in Chicago style and in alphabetical order.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - The sources are diverse and taken from many different places/authors. One of the sources was taken from a spanish website.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Check a few links. Do they work? - I tried all the links and they worked/redirected me to the links. I found a lot of possible sources that you can possible implement in your article or just insert in the bibliography or external links:

"Quique Rivera Rivera". Vimeo. Retrieved 2021-04-03.

"Quinceañera Coming of Age Celebration (Virtual Event". Latinx Arts Alliance. Retrieved 2021-04-03.

"Quique" Rivera to lead workshops on stop-motion animation". San Diego Union-Tribune en Español (in Spanish). Retrieved 2021-04-03.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - The content is concise and easy to read, there are also no grammatical/spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - The most confusing section is the Artworks content section. It is unclear what artworks you are talking about at times. I suggest maybe implementing sub-headings and separating the content into their own sections. Maybe do this too in the collections section and writing a background/summary on what the collections are about.

Images and Media


 * No images are used.

For New Articles


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? - The sources are reliable and use many different types of secondary sources.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? - All the features used are good, I would just suggest to use a table for the awards too. Also for the bibliography be sure to properly cite them in Chicago style.

Overall Impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - So far everything is looking good. It's said in a neutral tone and the sources have worked and are from secondary publications.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - There's a lot of good information about Rivera's career and education.
 * How can the content added be improved? - Some improvements to think about are maybe background information such as his culture to fill equity gaps, implement sub-headings when talking about specific artworks, try to find videos about Rivera and maybe cite those or put it in the bibliography, and don't forget to cite the bibliography sources in chicago style.

- Good luck and good job so far!