User:01k yama/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Visual communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason why I have chosen this article to evaluate is that this topic is the most familiar for me of all. I always take part in "visual communication" through my daily life. For example, I like to take photos and post them on SNS. I think it's one of the visual communication. In addition, I use Emoji when I text to someone. In these ways, I'm in the visual communication without realizing it. I'd like to know about it more deeply. Also, this article was last updated on my birthday. Therefore, I picked this article for my evaluation assignment.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

This lead section has an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. I could understand a brief summary about what the visual communication is. It also includes types or elements of it. In addition, it mentions some roles of visual communication. I think these explanations make readers more interested in it. All sentences have reference and covers almost all the article's major section. If I had to say, this lead section doesn't say about medicine which is mentioned later.

Content

This content relates the article's topic "visual communication". I think that readers can understand easily because each section is subdivided. Also, each section has a lot of information, it makes more clear about visual communication. On the other hand, one sentence includes like self-published source and there is sentences which are needed citation. In addition, I guess this content has an equity gap because the culture section is less than others, and it does not up-to-date references. They are points which can be remediated.

Tone and Balance

This article's tone and balance look like totally good. It is neutral. There aren't any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. It doesn't have the first-speech like "I or we". The article isn't likely to attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References

Almost all this article's sources and references are reliable, but some of them are not. This includes self-published source but most are referenced by organizations, educational institutions, or published books. However, there is sentences which are needed citation. In addition, some references are not current sources, and don't have referred pages. The second reference doesn't work.

Organization and Writing quality

The article look like well-written and well-organized. It is concise, clear, and easy to read. Also it seems like there are not grammatical and spelling errors. Overall easy to see and understand.

Images and Media

This article doesn't have much images and media. it has only 2 images. I think it would be easier for the reader to understand if more images were used. However, these images include well-captioned.

Talk page discussion

There are some advice to improve this article. People talk about what this article need. Also there are some opinions about it. Among them, I am evaluating now, and there was also content that I could sympathize with.

Overall impressions

I think this article provides a thorough and detailed discussion of the use and significance of visual communication in social media, culture, and politics. In addition, I would like to see more instances of how visual communication is used in new media, including brief videos. Its strength is that it has detailed examples. They make readers understand visual communication more easily. Also, this article can be improved by adding more current resources. I think it would be better with increasing culture section contents more. But overall, it's well-structured, and I've learned a lot about visual communication myself.