User:02barryc/Dahnresponse2


 * the assertion itself is not untrue; what is untrue is the fact that it brought about Romania's rule over Transylvania; what did bring about Romania's rule over Transylvania was the Treaty of Trianon, as the text currently makes clear
 * its relevance was rejected by the Romanian government of the times, and it only surfaced as a "meaningful gesture" in context after the actual decision from above became unfashionable (namely, in Communist Romania)
 * Criztu fails to note that "Romanians taking control of the administration" is not at all equal to "Romania taking control of the administration"; the matter of sovereignty did not at all reside there, and all knots were tied after Trianon, not before
 * it is adequately presented, with adequate commentary, on relevant pages, and certainly does not belong in the lead