User:02barryc/Dahnresponse3


 * the very idea that the mention would be flattering the Hungarian community is illogical (since mention is not made of the Hungarian community, but of an administrative system which was created under the Kings of Hungary)
 * the system was endorsed by the local ruling class for centuries on end, and was adopted by rules other than Hungarian (including Transylvania's existance as an independent polity - which should be relevant in itself)
 * the destination page, as is, is for the Kingdom of Hungary; whoever reads into this irredentism or some other chimera uses sophistry
 * the mention is included alongside other traditional divisions, and is perfectly useful as information for people who want to see the way Transylvania was administrated in the past)