User:02jtroxel/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Modulor

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was a new topic that I knew nothing about and it seemed important to architecture overall. It matters in architecture because it is frequently used in every building developed. I originally thought the article was pretty short for the amount of importance this subject has on architecture.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

The lead section has a good introductory sentence that is very clear and concise.

It does contain a section of the listed titles of the articles main sections.

The lead also includes information that is present in the rest of the article.

The lead in this article is very concise but not overly detailed.

Content:

The articles content is very relevant to the topic at hand.

The content is not very up to date. The citations are all from 2004 or earlier.

All the content seems to belong, however the "usage" part could have more information.

This does not deal with one of the equity gaps nor does it relate to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance:

The article is neutral.

There are no claims that are biased.

There is no highlight on a viewpoint but there could be more information on the usage section.

There are no minority or fringe viewpoints that are described.

The article does not attempt to persuade the audience one way or another.

Sources and References:

The information seems to be backed up by reliable sources.

The sources are thorough, however, there should be more information based on the sources that are provided.

The sources are not very current.

The sources are not very diverse but there is good information on historically marginalized individuals.

There are better sources available.

All the links work and send you to the correct articles.

Images and Media:

The images enhance the understanding however there could be more.

The images have good descriptions.

The images also all adhere to the copyright regulations.

They are laid out in a visually appealing way, however, more images would help.

Talk Page Discussion:

There is a talk page with this article and the topics include source dates as well as needing to keep the page updated.

This article is part of Wikiproject. It has a C rating with high importance however, we have not talked about this in class.

Overall Feedback:

Overall this article is on the shorter side but provides enough information to gain some understanding of the topic.

This article has a good history section as well as many linked articles.

It lacks pictures, up to date sources as well as up to date information (based on sources).

I would improve this article by finding new (up to date sources) in order to add more up to date information on the subject and how it is used.

I think the article was well developed. It just needs updated information on top of the information that is already provided.