User:1,1,2,3,5,8-BelaC/sandbox

Paragraph: Set the style of your text. For example, make a header or plain paragraph text. You can also use it to offset block quotes.
A : Highlight your text, then click here to format it with bold, italics, etc. The “More” options allows you to underline (U), cross-out text (S) , , change language keyboards (Aあ), and clear all formatting ( ⃠ ).

Links: Highlight text and push this button to make it a link. The Visual Editor will automatically suggest related Wikipedia articles for that word or phrase. This is a great way to connect your article to more Wikipedia content. You only have to link important words once, usually during the first time they appear. If you want to link to pages outside of Wikipedia (for an “external links” section, for example) click on the “External link” tab.

Cite: The citation tool in the Visual Editor helps format your citations. You can simply paste a DOI or URL, and the Visual Editor will try to sort out all of the fields you need. Be sure to review it, however, and apply missing fields manually (if you know them). You can also add books, journals, news, and websites manually. That opens up a quick guide for inputting your citations. Once you've added a source, you can click the “re-use” tab to cite it again.

Bullets: To add bullet points or a numbered list, click here.

Insert: This tab lets you add media, images, or tables.

Ω: This tab allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words, scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions.

Article Evaluation: Flame Test

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?


 * What else could be improved?

-Article is focused and concise.

-Information up to date and full.

-More sources could be used, possibly adding the history of the flame test?


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

-Neutral, possibly due to subject matter

-No real viewpoints available to over/under represent


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

-Links work and are supported.

-Could use sources on color and element table. No sources listed there at all.

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

-Talks about fixing structure, adding pictures, removing vandalism

-In a Chemistry WikiProject. Rated Start Level and Low Importance.

-We talk about reasons for seeing the effects, articles talks about the effects and how to perform the test.

Article Selection (Possibilities and Notes)
Xanthoproteic reaction - Short, informal tone, stub low importance

Noel Bayliss - short, aggrandizing tone, why does he have a mineral named after him? Very little information. Stub, low importance

Green death - little data about development, creation, discovery. Stub low importance

Fractional crystallization (chemistry) - stub, mid importance. Very little data, few sources.

Kochi reaction - Stub, mid importance. How discovered, why important, why useful, etc. Very little data.

Sophus Mads Jørgensen - Stub, low importance. Founder of coordination chemistry, with important contributions to platinum and rhodium chemistry, but barely any data on him is present.