User:108.30.253.100/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Warner Brother Studios)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I am big fan of film making and my dream is to become an actor.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
- The Lead includes an introductory sentence that is very concise and easy to understand.

- The Lead does not include a brief description pertaining to the article.

- No the Lead has information that the rest of the article touches upon.

- the Lead is very concise and straight to the point.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
- The article content pertains to the topic because it gives you detailed information from Warner Bros inception to the current day.

- the content of the article is up to date.

- No all content seems to belong and is written in great detail.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes the article speaks the facts
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
- yes the article speaks the facts.

- I didn't see any biased facts it seemed to be more of factual content.

- the content and viewpoints are very detailed and at times overly represented.

- The article seems to attempt to persuade the reader in favor because it brings up facts that happened around wars.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
- yes the article seems to be backed by ton of reliable information.

-yes the sources are very thorough.

- Yes the sources are current.

- The Links that were provided work and seem to be very current.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
-the article is well written and concise.

- the article seems to have little grammatical and spelling errors.

- the article is well organized and the article breaks down different times into sections.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
-The article has a ton of images relating to the topic at hand.

- yes the images are well captioned and very detailed.

- yes

- yes the images are very visually artistic and appealing and very original.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
- there is a conversation going on about the actual title of Warner bros.

- yes

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
- The articles overall status is to explain what Warner Bros and how it originated.

- The article gives a lot of information of the history of Warner Bros and how it came to be.

- It could be shortened- the article is well developed and written to well developed and written actually.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: