User:1234r00t/Adminship

Adminship is a very touchy topic right now. Many users continue to complain that adminship is not a big deal while also saying that RfA is not hard enough. If adminship was not a big deal that we could do what Jimbo did back when adminship was first created and just give it to anyone who had a reasonable amount of trust, e.g. not blocked, no history of vandalism. Now we are extremely bureaucratic and insist on making a huge deal out of adminship. Of course now that we are in the top ten websties we have to be stricter. Of course we need better quality control. Well, if that's the case then wouldn't the logical explanation be to make it more difficult to protect the Encyclopaedia? Clearly that is not what you want to do.

How I vote
I'm only going to oppose if a user applies way to early, as I did, if the user has a history of vandalism, the user has made less than 200 edits to the mainspace, the user has made less than 500 edits to Wikipedia space, less than 100 to Wikipedia talk space, and less than 250 to Talk space. I would like one or two GA/ FA reviews but that isn't a deal breaker.