User:131.151.252.111/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Article: Biomedical Sciences


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The article itself is not very large, and all of the information is relevant, but could be expanded on.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Most of the information is out of date going back to 10 years ago, and they didn't include any information on the history of biomedical sciences they just briefly went over the definition of biomedical science and the different fields
 * What else could be improved?
 * The information in the article could be more relevant today, and could have a history of the topic included as well.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is not that neutral, all of the references are from the UK and so the article is only portraying the United Kingdoms field of biomedical sciences
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented
 * The viewpoints of biomedical scientists from the United Kingdom are overrepresented since that's where all of the information came from. The views from other biomedical scientists from all over the world are underrepresented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I checked the first two links, which were from 2008, and 2011 and they were both broken links. So I'm going to say that that the source does not support the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Not every single fact stated in the article is cited with a reliable source.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?