User:131.151.252.122/sandbox

Article Evaluation Article Evaluated: Maya Ceramics

1. Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The first thing I noticed as distraction was the occasional grammar mistake or wordy sentence. There is someone mentioned in the article (Prudence M Rice) but the author does not state who they are nor is there a cited source with that name. The section on form and function is a little bare, and could probably be improved upon by talking about the form of the ceramics as opposed to just the function.

2. There's a phrase in the article that describes the ceramics as wonderful, however besides that the article is neutral.

3. There aren't any viewpoints that are over or under presented in this article

4.The one URL in the notes section leads to a page that no longer exists, the other note references a book. The references are all books, most of which appear to be textbooks.

5. No, there are only two places in the article (the two tables) where references are included. I don't know if these are reliable sources because one does not exist anymore and the other is a book I do not have and cannot find any reviews for online. 6. Nothing seems out of date, however if they are going to call the first section "Form and Function" they should add information about the form of the ceramics in addition to what's there about the function.

7. There are some pictures that a user is hoping to eventually integrate into the article. Another user does not think that one of the sources is a reliable one, because it is a tourist booklet published in 1984. There is also some talk of newly discovered pottery that will likely be added however there aren't enough references on them yet.

8. This is a start class article, and is not part of any Wikiprojects, but is of importance to these Wikiprojects: WikiProject Mesoamerica, WikiProject Mexico, WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, and WikiProject Visual arts.

9. As of yet, we have not discussed Maya ceramics in class.