User:131.91.4.53/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Martial arts
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

I think it's interesting

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes it does
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is very concise and well worded

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * For the most part. I'm definitely not an expert in this topic but it looks well researched and up to date. The one note I would have on this is the history of Martial Arts only goes up to 2011.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I couldn't really tell if anything is missing, for I am not well versed in this topic, everything looks like it belongs.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I could not find any cases of this
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I wouldn't say so
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, all the references look credible. There are a few places where there are "citation needed" notes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes it does, there are many references covering a wide range of topics in martial arts and other related topics
 * Are the sources current?
 * The most recent source on the references page is from 2010. A lot of the article is about the history of martial arts so books and resources from the past are very relevant for this article.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, all the links that I checked did work

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * The only note i have on this is on the topic of "Reviving of lost martial arts". This sounds weird to me when I read it to myself, this is the only thing I could find in the article that seemed grammatically incorrect.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes and no, the images are relevant and related and interesting; but a few don't necessarily "enhance understanding" of martial arts.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Possibly
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * I think so

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is one conversation where someone says that the article talks about fitness benefits but not about physical risks. There was another conversation about a subcategory in the article and why it should be written and how.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * A level 3 Vital article
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We didn't discuss this topic in class

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * B-class
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It does a good job of covering the broad spectrum of different martial arts and the history of it.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Add citations where need be and possible add some recent information.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is very well developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: