User:138.237.13.57/sandbox

Is everything in this article related to the topic? Is there anything that distracted you? -Everything seemed to be relevant in the article -Something that distracted me is how they emphasized his "disciplinary issues," which is not an excuse Is the article neutral? Are there any claims or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -It's pretty neutral Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented? -The article is based on the idea of mental distress and behavioral issues from the suspect. Check a few citations, do the links work? Does the sources support the claims in the article? -Yes Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable source? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? -There are a variety of news sources, some are biased due to the different perceptions of news outlets. Is any information out of date? Anything missing that could be added? -More information about the victims could be added, and less of a focus on Cruz. Check out the talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes on how to represent this topic? -There was a lot of conversation going on about the type of weapon that was used How is the article rated? Is it apart of WikiProjects? It is not yet rated and apart of a lot of projects. How does the way wikipedia discuss this topic differ from the way we've discussed it in class? Wikipedia mainly talks about mental distress and what Cruz experienced growing up, in class we discussed violence and masculinity within this issue.