User:146.115.83.196/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Wikipedia article: Six Sigma

•Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? It looks like everything in the article is relevant to the topic as it provides key points and important insight about Six Sigma. The article contains multiple subtopics that helps explain how this philosophy works. To be honest, there's nothing that distracted me when reading the article.

•Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is certainly not biased as it shows both the positive effects of applying this doctrine and the different types of criticism against Six Sigma.

•Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Not much representation towards where Six Sigma can be applied. The article does not provide the sectors/different companies where this philosophy can be applied for.

•Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Some citations work like 1, 6 and 25 work

•Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Most of the references are mostly academic articles, which are reliable. There is a section in this article called "Criticism." However, the information here is not biased as it is based on scientific data. This other part of the coin makes the article more interesting as it gives the advantages and flaws of Six Sigma.

•Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? It looks like there's nothing out of date.

•Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The majority of the conversations were about whether or not they should add certain types of information to the article.

•How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?