User:147.97.27.182/Evaluate an Article

i am typing in the box below.

The article that I have chosen to review is Arkansas Law Enforcement Training Academy. The article can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_Law_Enforcement_Training_Academy.

As the spouse of a law enforcement officer, I know now important their training is. I found the article to not only be short in length, but very vague and lacked a lot of valuable information. The first error I noticed was in the introduction and where ALETA is located. There was basic information about the history of ALETA and how it came to be, however nothing was elaborated on. I would have liked to have read more information on the creation of the Shumaker Naval Ammunition Depot and the reasons behind why President Johnson turned the Shumaker Naval Ammunition Depot over to the State of Arkansas.

I would have also like to have read more information about the actual training they received at ALETA. As I mentioned before, I am married to a police officer and am aware of the training he received, but he is on the local level, and I would like to see how the training differs on the state level. I also would have liked to have read about the training the officers receive in Arkansas compared to that of officers in other states.

The article mentioned Camp Robinson, however the link that was provided does not take you to a page for Camp Robinson - it states that there is not a page.

A few useful articles in the ASUB library database would provide more detailed and useful information would be:

Law Enforcement Training Centers: Highlights Of Institutions With Law Enforcement Training Programs Of National Significance

Turning Point: World War II and the Economic Development of Arkansas

TACTICS AND TRAINING: HOW DO WE REACH THE NEXT LEVEL?

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions:


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page
Guiding questions:


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes ~


 * Link to feedback: