User:151.213.213.144/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * I have chosen FL Studio for my article evaluation.
 * I have been producing music using Fl Studio for the last 14 years. I find it to be user friendly and compatible with external devices and internal software.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * The FL Studio article i chose has perfect introduction, mentioning that Image-Line is a Belgium company that created Fruity Loops producing studio. The article explains that the program uses a Graphical user interface that is based on a Music sequencer pattern. Which basically is saying you do not need a instrument to record music, instead a Piano roll was built in to the program. The article explains which operating systems can support FL Studio and what editions are available.
 * The article does mention that Virtual Studio Technology (VST MIDI) is available to create music on this program. As you scroll further down it has a list of the VST MIDI's that come with the program. You can also download any VST MIDI's of your choice as long as the file is .dll file.
 * Most of the links at the bottom of the page just direct you to Image-Line Software. So i guess everyone got their info from the site where you buy the program.
 * The article is precise on what FL Studio is and what it does, but it is saturated with links to the web page where you buy the program and the notable users are producers and artist that use the program.




 * The articles content is very irrelevant for the topic. The whole article is about fruity loops software.
 * The content was last modified in July of 2019, as far as i know they haven't released a newer version of the software.
 * Some of the links takes you to personal web pages or articles about the artist using FL Studio to create his music. I don't think this should be on here for the article is suppose to be about the program itself and not the musician that uses it.




 * The article is very neutral and mainly speaks about only FL Studio and what it has to offer.
 * No there are no claims that are overly bias and speak about only one thing.
 * The references would be the only thing that is saturating the page with pretty much the same link to the same page, other then that, some links go to personal web pages.
 * No the article does not mention the other programs to persuade someone to use instead of FL Studio.




 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: