User:1597 CE/Activated complex/Berkeker.22 Peer Review

General info
1597 CE and Fanaryne
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:1597 CE/Activated complex
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Activated complex

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: the original article has not yet been updated. The lead does have an introductory sentence that is very clear. Yes the lead includes a brief description of the articles major descripton but history can be worked on a bit more. Yes the lead inlcudes stuff not from the article such as history and reaction rate. the lad is concise.

Content: The content that is addded up to date where it can be seen from the ciations they have made which are relavent to the timeline.

Tone and Balance: The history part of the lead is underrepresentrated where it is only one centence and doesnt give much clear information.

Sources and References: Sources are up to date and citated in the sentences and paragraphs while all links to the references are working. More ciations could be used.

Organization: Everthing on the lead page is organized and put into sections thus making it easy to read.

Images and Media: The images of equations are not well captioned or doesnt have a caption at all making it confusing about what they are.

Overall: The lead has already significantly improved the main article with adding new points and pictures. more figures can be put and more detail about whta theya re could be done.