User:1597 CE/Activated complex/Moya.priroda Peer Review

General info
1597 CE
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:1597 CE/Activated complex - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Activated complex - Wikipedia

Lead
In the lead, out of the first two sentences, I would choose the second one to be the introductory sentence, I think it encompasses the jist of the "activation complex". Other than that, the lead includes some information that is not described later, as the article only has a "History" and a "Reaction Rate" sections after the lead. Other than that, I think the lead section is comprehensive but it might be overly detailed.

Content
All the information added perfectly fits the topic. However, there are some sources that are not the most up-to-date, such as those from 1935.

Tone and Balance
It is difficult to make an article about activation complex sound biased. The editor used appropriate neutral language. The "History" section might be too short and underrepresented. However, in my opinion, it is not the most significant aspect of activation complex, so it might be best to keep it concise.

Sources and References
As mentioned earlier, some of the sources are not the most up-to-date, but they are all reliable. Most of the links work, however, some of them such as (Peter Atkins and Julio de Paula, Physical Chemistry (8th ed., W.H. Freeman 2006), p.809 ISBN 0-7167-8759-8) and (Ptáček, Petr; Opravil, Tomáš; Šoukal, František (2018). "Introduction to the Transition State Theory". Introducing the Effective Mass of Activated Complex and the Discussion on the Wave Function of this Instanton. InTech. ISBN 978-1-78923-481-7 ) don't have links that can easily be followed. If possible, I think it's best to add followable links.

Organization
Content is well-prganized and written in a concise language. I didn't spot any typographical errors.

Images and Media
The article includes a useful reaction diagram. The title describes where on that diagram the activation complex is, but I think it would be best to find or create a diagram that has an activation complex indicated in it.

Also, the article includes two relevant formulas.

Overall impressions
The editor did a good job in adding information about the activation complex. As I can see from the original article, it did not have anything except the lead section. Now it is definetely more comprehensive.