User:1597 CE/Activated complex/SarahRundle Peer Review

General info
1597 CE and Fanaryne
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:1597 CE/Activated complex
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Activated complex
 * Activated complex

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:

- The content added provides useful context to an originally barren article. I found the breakdown of the sections into Background, History, and Reaction Rate with symmetry and transition state theory within was a very logical way of forming the article.

Tone and Balance:

-The tone of the added information is neutral and follows wikipedias guidelines.

Sources:

-All added information is well sourced and clearly has been researched.

Line Edits:

-provide hyperlink to "saddle point" or define what that is in chemical terms

-First two sentences are sort of awkward. Activated complex is defined twice back to back, but with different definitions?

-create a hyperlink for activation energy

-Find a more formal way to say "based on the idea that" in the transition state theory section

I like the addition of the see also section.