User:17HugheC/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Legal history
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article because it a field that is very interesting to me and will be a big part of my education in law school next year.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes it is concise but easy to understand.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * the lead walks through the main points and also provides a table of contents for the article
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * no, the lead is concise and only contains relevant information
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes the content is well researched and thorough
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * yes- last edited on January 1, 2020
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I have not encountered any missing or extraneous content

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No- the facts are presented in a way that is neutral towards all historical perspectives
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, most sentences and paragraphs have multiple sources and links to back up given information
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes and there are also supplemental external links provided to enhance the article
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes most have publishing dates within the last 5 years
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes, the topic is broken down into multiple concise subjects that contribute to the overall understanding and clarity of the article

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * there are a few images but more could be supplemented
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * yes, the images are cited corrected and also have tags that say "public domain" when clicked
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * all images are on the right side margin of the page and are out of the way of the text, but also could be easily overseen

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * the talk page conversations are related to looking for the best links and sources continually to support the given information
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * rated level-4 vital
 * the article is a part of WikiProjectLaw and WIkiProject History
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * also includes talk of merging information from other pages into that page

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * level-4 vital
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * provides the history of legal studies and its origins from all over the world.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Inclusion of more examples for how it applies to the US rather than just links to other pages
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * well developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: