User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function/AstroWiki143 Peer Review

General info
18roo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Lateralization of brain function

Evaluate the drafted changes
I'll be going from top to bottom with my peer review and adding things as I read the article.

Language

Title of this section should be a sub-heading.

The first paragraph in this section is verbatim from the source and need to be entirely reworded. The original article had a textbook as a citation for it, but this website- https://med.libretexts.org/Courses/James_Madison_University/AandP_for_STEM_Educators/09%3A_Central_Nervous_System/9.07%3A_Functional_Systems_of_the_Cerebral_Cortex/9.7D%3A__Hemispheric_Lateralization - might be a better choice since it is more easily accessible then a physical textbook.

The citation for the sentence "In both species of vertebrates and invertebrates laterization can be found in many" looks to be incorrect and the website it leads to has no mention about species. I did however find this website - https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/7/1996 - that mentions the content of that sentence. I found that link when looking at the editing history of the sandbox article.

There are also multiple broken citations in this section that aren't clickable to see an actual source.

There might be a problem with how citations are being inserted into the draft and that's what's causing the issue? Clicking the citations within the text, doesn't take you to the articles bibliography/reference section at the bottom, and instead takes you to an article. This means that the citations don't match up with the reference section and it is hard to get to the sources.

I'm not sure if the two bold sentences in this section fit in with the article itself. The article seems to be about humans and those two sentences deal with animals and are taken from the same animal article, and don't have to do with language.

The second paragraph seems to be verbatim as well and the source goes to another textbook. Finding another source and rewording the paragraph it would be beneficial.

Clinical Significance

Not sure if this is supposed to be an actual heading like the original article or not

Citation needs to be put in for the first part of that first paragraph before the sentence in bold.

For the sentence the two sentences in bold - a better source to use would be - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393221001354?via%3Dihub - since most readers won't have access to the databases we use.

Citations needed for section between the two bold sentences, as well as the last paragraph in that section.

This section also has citations that need to be fixed

Society and Culture

I honestly don't know if a section focused solely on myths about the topic should even be included in this article

Overall thoughts

The sources/citations really need to be fixed throughout the article. Broken citations need to be removed, or edited so they actually link to the references at the bottom of the article. The citations already linked, need to be correctly inputted so they populate the reference/bibliography section instead of taking you directly to an outside website.

The plagiarized paragraphs need to be reworded- don't worry, our original article was basically ALL plagiarized and we had to do a lot of reworking/rewording as well.