User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function/Birdie2324 Peer Review

General info
18roo's group
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Lateralization of brain function

Evaluate the drafted changes
When editing, I would look at the references portion of the draft. It is not formatted properly and there seems to be sources mis linked within the article. (hyperlinks numbered 1-4 but only two sources cited.) I would also check that the images with captions have captions that help the images complement the article and that images without captions get one. I think this group did a good job of stay neutral and following the guidelines of not picking sides. As far as formatting goes, I like that sections are separated by headers, it mimics the traditional wiki style well. I would double check that you aren't bolding sentences though. Maybe that's an editing error? I would maybe describe the study you mentioned in the "counter point" section and reference an article to boost your point. But that also could be in the main article and I'm just not seeing it. Great job!