User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function/Mirmir77 Peer Review

The introductory of the article is very detailed, however it highlights all points that are found within the body or content of the article. The topic is clearly stated and there is a brief explanation of it in the first sentence. I do believe the introduction has a bit too many details, however, for the most part the details are all necessary. Furthermore, the sources are all strong and support the necessary point in the article very well. Upon reading, the tone of the article seems to be highly neutral and highly informative. It doesn't lean towards opinions at all and stays on topic. The topic of lateralization of brain function seems to be underrepresented and the contributors here have provided concise and relevant information that pertains to the topic. The organization of the article isn't clear cut and simple, but this is necessary given the information it is presenting and how it has to go about that. The images and diagrams are very well placed and are relevant to the information it is trying to represent. Overall, some aspects of the article can be shortened and summed up as it can come off as a bit clunky, but this may be necessary.

General info
Ph1275, MinnieMollet3, 18roo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Lateralization of brain function
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)