User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function/Soccernumber1 Peer Review

General info
18roo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:18roo/Lateralization of brain function
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? During the research process, they provided a brief summary of their topic and provided a quick illustration of what the left and right hemispheres of our brains have
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?   I would argue that one of the things they are most likely lacking is their level of detail. Perhaps this is simply the result of some members not completing their tasks, but there are still a few details that might be in-depth and helpful to their particular issue.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Is the newly added material pertinent to the subject? I would simply want to see it reduced a little short and made a little bit more basic so that it's simpler to grasp and better planned out, even if many of their concepts and facts are linked to the issue.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?   Just skimming the paper, I would infer that there is knowledge in there that we do not currently understand. They have covered a few subjects that they could have definitely organized and labeled as headers to make it simpler for readers to recognize them. However, I think they may have simply concentrated on one single issue, which could have taken them a little longer to identify.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral?   Since we personally  use and are in our bodys where we use on a daily basis, I believe that this content is fairly natural to someone. Since we use it so frequently, it should be something we know more about and are more in-depth about.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?   Their perspectives, in my opinion, are under-presented because they don't really elaborate on the material they are provided with. Instead, they merely provide a few more details on a single topic, and for the remaining subjects, they keep things fairly straightforward, striking a balance between being overly presented and being under-presented.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Is every new piece of material supported by a trustworthy secondary source of data? They had a few references, which I think makes the majority of their material quite trustworthy. They also made it easy to determine what information they acquired from those websites by bolding it, which was really kind of them, and by including a paragraph with clinical importance.
 * Are the sources current? - Based on the dates of the references they cited, it appears that the oldest one they used is from 2020, which is fairly updated given the number of other references I looked up for my most recent peer review. It's also nice to see that they have reasonably current information because this is a challenging topic when it comes to trying to identify lateral views of the brain and being particular about each topic.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - When examining the other references, it is evident that these resources are also from medical schools and are somewhat related to one another. One of these resources is published by the Harvard University Health Publications medical school.

Overall impressions


 * How can the content added be improved? I believe there is a simple solution to this research. Although there are many different topics to discuss when talking about the brain, I believe that if they just fixed her layout properly and perhaps made some of the paragraphs smaller, it would be easier for readers to understand what they are trying to say. You can definitely play around with this and find a way to make it easier, not trying to put too much information or repeat yourself as something that might help a lot and maybe just getting straight to the point as like I said it's something very particular.

Additional questions


 * I do not have any additional questions. I would just say try fixing those small little things and I believe that this research about your topic could be something awesome to read about and enjoy.

-Yadira