User:198.190.214.4/sandbox

Article Evaluation -- History of Human Rights Everything in the article is related to the topic. It is very detailed and has many different examples. Nothing really distracted me too much and that s what i liked about it. The article is very nuetral. The author is not taking any sides, only stating facts of history. I dont think there are any that are over or under represented. Each viewpoint is a few paragraphs with a picture. The one cited source was a working and reliable link. It definitely supports the claim as well. No, but majority of them are. There was only two without an article to go with it. No none of the information is outdated, but more present topics could be added. They are talking about how to fix citations, and some things needed to be taken out or rearranged. I dont think it is rated because I dont see anywhere that talks about it being apart of anything. This article is being very detailed on many topics, while in class we've only went into detail with one topic.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 *  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 *  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

The article I selected is titled Mother of The Movement. From the looks of the article it seems like I could add more background information about the group. By adding more background information it would help the reader understand the article more. I would also added more information about the group today, like there whereabouts and how many people have joined since then. Another thing I would like to add are ways on how to help or be apart of the movement.

This article is a great article when it comes to human rights, because as an African American some of the rights that we have are taking away from us by law enforcers. As a human we should have the right to wear hoodies and other things of that nature, but some African Americans have became victim to police brutality just because of sterotyping. As of today I have read up on a couple of the cases of the African American that were killed by law enforcers, and for the most part some of the situation could have been handled differently.

References: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/26/politics/mothers-movement-dnc-hillary-clinton/index.html

https://mic.com/articles/122430/eric-garners-daughter-reflects-on-fathers-death-one-year-later#.nERHPwdYX

http://time.com/4424704/dnc-mothers-movement-transcript-speech-video/

http://www.ebony.com/entertainment-culture/mothers-of-the-movement-dr-oz