User:199.8.28.32/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Everything in the article was relevant information to the topic. There were no dates listed, so adding dates could be something that should be included. A picture might be helpful to better understand the information listed. The article seemed to be solely based on fact vs opinion. It was easy to understand and the links to the other sources worked. The article was rated a C- article. People were saying that each theory within the page needed its own page. I agree with this because it would be easier to understand and find what you need. The article is very generic and doesn't give much detail.