User:19dakota19/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the Flowering Sunday article.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the Welsh language is an endangered language & it interests me a lot. When I was doing some research on the Welsh culture, I came across this holiday that the Welsh celebrate. This holiday matters because it takes place on Palm Sunday & it is where the Welsh place flowers & other decorations on people's graves. I think this is so important because this is a tradition from the 17th century & it is still practiced today. My preliminary impression of what it was at first was that it was only celebrated on Palm Sunday, however it can be celebrated on pretty much any Sunday. I thought it was a really peaceful, positive celebration.

Evaluate the article
The lead of this article includes a clear & concise introduction that clearly explains the topic & goes into detail, but not too much detail. This article's content is very relevant to the topic & it was last edited in 2019 so it is pretty recent. To my knowledge there is no missing content & it does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The article is from a neutral, unbiased standpoint & there are no signs of persuasion. The references are all from journals, books, & reliable sources. The sources are also current, except for the two-three primary sources from the 1700-1900's. I actually found this article to be very easy to read & very interesting. Usually I am easily distracted and thrown off by passages about history, but I felt engaged the whole time. I have not found any grammatical errors & it appears to be in an organized fashion.The only problem with this article is that there are very few pictures & the pictures are all older & illustrated. They all do have captions about what the picture is, but they aren't very visually pleasing & they kind of bore me. Regarding the talk page, there are no discussions which raises some questions because a lot of historical articles contain discussions. Overall, this article was a very informative & interesting article, however there are a few things I would change. I would add newer pictures, if possible & more pictures. I am a very visual person so this would be beneficial. I would also incorporate a talk page, perhaps by engaging different authors to edit & critique this page. Other than that, its short & packed with information.