User:19dakota19/Mangareva language/Milinpatel1369 Peer Review

19dakota19 does not have a lead paragraph. The article is incomplete so a peer review will not be possible. There are sources which I would say meet the criteria. There are nine sources present which makes it sufficient to being the lead paragraph. The articles are scholarly. Now that the nine sources have been obtained, I would suggest to being creating the article for the Mangareva Language. Start of with a lead and then continue to make other sections of the article. There is a lot work that needs to be done. There is no information available in this article other then the nine sources in bibliography page. Once there is actual information present it will be fit for a peer review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)