User:19djky23$/Isidore of Miletus/Rivico Peer Review

General info

 * 19djky23$


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:19djky23$/Isidore of Miletus - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Isidore of Miletus - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
I believe that Anthemius of Tralles does not need to be mentioned in the lead as I see it as unnecessary information. Whenever the article mentions Isidore compilation of Archimedes' work and his studies on it. I think it would be very nice to see what lead him to that point and why he decided to go through with it in is biography. Overall, I think your article is very well written and has little flaws that I could see.

Response to evaluation and plans for the future

I plan to leave the mention of Anthemius as the lead section is quite small anyway so keeping it filled out seems more important than keeping it concise, and the fact that both men worked on the project seems significant enough to include. I would like to elaborate on Isidore's compilation of Archimedes' work, however information on his life is scarce so it may or may not be possible to find the background information necessary.