User:19steezy/Evaluate an Article

== Which article are you evaluating? ==

Category:Academic disciplines

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I've chosen this specific article to evaluate since it's in my interest to know which are the Academic disciplines available today, this is also why it matters, today any student is allowed to have one or more Academic discipline listed in there.

At first, I was impressed by how well-organised it was and how there would be every type of discipline.

Evaluate the article
The Wikipedia article on Academic discipline appears to be relevant to the article topic and does not contain any distracting information. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the subject, including its history, evolution, and different types of academic disciplines.

The article appears to be up-to-date, and there is no missing information that could be added. The article provides neutral and reliable sources to support its claims, and the links appear to work. The sources cited in the article come from a diverse array of authors and publications, including academic journals, books, and other scholarly sources.

I did not identify any notable equity gaps in the article. The article appears to be neutral and does not appear to underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations.

Overall, the Wikipedia article on Academic discipline appears to be a reliable and neutral source of information on the subject. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the subject, and the sources cited in the article are neutral, reliable, and come from a diverse array of authors and publications.