User:1MightBeRight/Orca (carbon capture plant)/VebraScience Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: Outlines what the article is about well and keeps it very brief. missing paratheses after first citation

Content: Recent information and adds needed information for readers. Is still relatively short and could use more positives.

Tone and Balance: Added information leans toward negative, but positive information is present

sources and references: only 3 sources present/added and missing sources from original article

Organization: all information is in the correct spot and reading through makes sense

Images and media: N/A

Overall impression: well organized and information added fits well, but more is needed and references need to be fixed.