User:1jsjs0q77/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
High School Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This was my high school. It locates in Shanghai, China. My school is affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University which is one of the four best universities in China.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: The lead section of this article is concise. It contains the basic information of High School Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University such as location, purpose, and time of establishment.

Content: The content contains six parts: School history, Achievement, Admission, List of Principles, References, and External links. However, in my opinion, school principles should not be separated as a single part but should be in the school history part. Other contents are related to the article and up to date.

Tone and Balance: This article is written in a neutral tone and no bias toward a particular position.

Source and References: The facts in the article are not backed up with enough references. In fact, there is only one reference which is the school website. This makes the article's content seems untrustworthy.

Organization and writing equality: The article is easy to read. There is no spelling mistakes. The section is well connected and balanced except the school principle section should be within the school history part.

Images and media: There is no images in this article.

Talk page discuss: The talk page suggests to add more contents because it seems this article is soon be deleted.

Overall impression: I will rate this article 8/10. This is because the article is enough for people who don't know this school to understand the basic information of this school. However, for me who stayed in this school for 3 years, the content seems lack of more information. And the list of principles seems not proper as a single part in the content.