User:1spidey3/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
We are evaluating the Content Editing article.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

We chose this article due to it's relation to our majors and how it can pertain to our futures. The article's revisions is to acquire more sources regarding the content of our article. Our preliminary impression was that the article seemed pretty manageable.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article's leading section starts strong with good flow of comparisons and to set up the article. Content editing can be classified as many different types of editing or fit into different subcategories. Considering the subject at hand, the content of the article is not lacking completely. However, there could be possible changes to consider or information to be added. The tone is very neutral and encyclopedic as it needs to be, and the balance of information is good but could be improved. The sources and references is where the main issues are for this article seeing as there is only two listed. There is still information within the article that can be cited to other sources, especially from the lead section. The article could also benefit from possible images and media to seem more appealing to the audiences for the short read that it is.