User:206.125.61.2/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * Horchata: 1.https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.temple.edu/docview/1883589997?accountid=14270&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
 * https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.temple.edu/docview/110382867?accountid=14270&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
 * http://web.b.ebscohost.com.libproxy.temple.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&sid=8ca4671e-3472-4b58-9746-e8d7e6c5a822%40pdc-v-sessmgr06
 * Comfort Food Sources: 1. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.libproxy.temple.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=2&sid=47951dfc-2bb0-4ae8-b6ca-072309584db6%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=2014-34446-001&db=pdh
 * 2. https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.temple.edu/doi/full/10.1177/0098628316679972
 * 3. https://www-sciencedirect-com.libproxy.temple.edu/science/article/pii/S0195666315000768
 * Energy Bars sources: 1. https://go-gale-com.libproxy.temple.edu/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=temple_main&id=GALE%7CA148136539&v=2.1&it=r
 * 2. https://go-gale-com.libproxy.temple.edu/ps/i.do?&id=GALE%7CA168317715&v=2.1&u=temple_main&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w
 * 3.https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.temple.edu/docview/1673047078?accountid=14270&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: