User:2177871t/Interactionism (philosophy of mind)/Willraschkowan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sjw.miya, Vraj.pastel, Jia 0703, 2177871t


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:2177871t


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Tt was not updated to reflect the new content. It does included an introductory sentence that clearly describes the articles topic. It is missing a breif description of the article's major sections. overall it is very concise and missing detail about the article.

Sources and references: All new content is baked up by reliable and up to date sources. It accurately shows what the sources say. Hyperlinks were added to new terms or names. Sources were correctly cited in text and in the bibliography.

Content: The content that was added is all relevant and up to date. There seems to be some content from the book that could be added to this article. There are parts of the book that could be included with the rest of the article.

Organization: The added content is very precise and clear. The added content is well organized and goes well with the rest of the article. Furthermore, the new headers help organize the entire article.

Tone and Balance: The added content is not overly biased, it is neutral. The new content does not sway the readers' opinions in any way, it is just stating fact. The general tone of the wikipedia article is not greatly affected by the new content.

Overall impressions: The added content has helped the article, mostly the headers has helped organize the article much more. However it seems there could be more content added from Amy Kind's book to add more context or general information to some parts of the article.