User:21percent/Silicon Carbide Color Centers/Jgrintz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

21percent


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Silicon carbide color centers
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead[edit]
nothing was added to the lead article

Content[edit]
Great job on covering a lot of different types of defects in silicon carbide

Sources[edit][edit]
the sites they used were professional and informative

Organization[edit]
good

Images/ Media[edit]
N/A

Overall Impressions[edit]

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in the article was relevant and clear
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Very neutral, no claims or opinions.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There were no viewpoints that were overrepresented or underrepresented.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I believe so there were a lot of links but I checked a few throughout
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Seems good to me.
 * Seems good to me.

'Overall I think this was a good article. the information was clear and concise. it obviously took a lot of work. but I would like to see more information on the comparison to Dimond color centers.'