User:22aneumann/Social movement theory/Petermcauliffe Peer Review

General info
Luke.sewpersaud, Katehaertl, Megan.Fournier, Kscourtney8
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Weekend Update
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Historical Context and Evolution: The article effectively outlines the origins and basic premises of the classical theories but falls short in tracing their evolution. A deeper historical context could enrich the reader's understanding, showing how these theories responded to the social and political climates of their times. Additionally, discussing how and why these theories have been challenged or expanded upon in contemporary research would provide a more dynamic view of the field.

Critical Analysis of Theoretical Limitations: While the article mentions contemporary sociologists and political scientists' shift away from psychologically-based theories, it could benefit from a more detailed critique. Specifically, it would be advantageous to explore the criticisms regarding the overemphasis on irrationality and the neglect of strategic, rational action within movements. Adding this insight could tie the narrative together better.

Comparative Perspectives: The article would benefit from a comparative analysis between classical and modern approaches. Such a comparison could highlight how newer theories have addressed the limitations of classical approaches, including the integration of on line activism, transnational movements, and identity politics. This would not only illustrate the progression of thought within the field but also the adaptability and expansion of social movement theory in response to global changes.