User:23miadg/sandbox

French Phonology

 * I would say for the most part everything in this article was relevant to the topic. There was a wide variety of contents in this article. Broken down into three main parts: Consonants, Vowels, and Stress. Each of these parts then broken down into subgroups that were all relevant to the topic.
 * I would say this article is natural. Most of the information in this article and factual and is unbias.
 * The viewpoints in this article were all impartial. They were pretty even in the information that was provided.
 * The citation I looked at all worked. The sources that are linked do help to support the claims of this article.
 * All the facts are referenced with a reliable source. The sources seem unbias and many of them are academic publications.
 * This article has been edited recently and seems to be put together well. There are a few parts that information could be added to such as the "Elision" and some of the "Vowels" section.
 * In the talk section of this article there is quite a little of conversation going on. Some topics include: "1st person inversion" and "Missing explicit info on the close vowels"
 * This article is rated a C-class article. This article is part of some WikiProjects being: WikiProject France, WikiProject Linguistics/ Phonetics, WikiProject Languages.
 * Some of the articles that we have read in class have bais. I found that Wikipedia tries to remain bias-free.