User:24.213.123.244/sandbox

Ageing Article:

Everything seems to stay on topic in this article and is relevant to their purpose. I got a little distracted in the medical intervention subject because of technical terms and sentences that might not be common knowledge. The article seemed to be based off of a neutral ground, however, in some specific subject their was a more biased and downer point of view. Yu can tell thy may feel strongly about something and wants their readers to know it. Most sources were seem to working, however there were a few duds: in the sociology section the Maturity link has good points but a lot of it seems to be bias and opinion, even though they have adequate sources. I found that some of the economic sources were not reliable. In the Biological Basis and Economics sections i noticed there were a few wonky sources. Some of the Economics and Medical Interventions facts and sources were from early 2000s or before, making them not as relevant and up-to-date with what is going on in 2018. The talking page brought about only a few comments. Some concerns were of the spelling, other factors and the link. Most were modified and fixed but others are still pending. This article is B-Class, it is ok for wiki but not the highest information you could get. Several people on the Talk Page were showing interest in this matter and further wanted it.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Check a few citations (hint: focus on the section about Sociology). Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Where do the citations come from?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?