User:2601:14F:4500:4029:6CA7:8AA3:3500:2EA3/sandbox

The article that I selected was the Speech Act article, however, the article looks incredibly complete and well done (from my unprofessional linguistic point of view) relative to the fairly incomplete nature of the other options. One thing this article seems to lack, however, are adequate citations. For example, some entire sections and paragraphs are completely without citations. This lack of citations is the first issue I would seek to rectify.

Potential Sources

http://qu.edu.iq/repository/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/engs-63.pdf Despite being directly quoted in the introductory paragraph of the article, there is currently no citation to the work of Kent Bach from which it is drawn.

"almost any speech act is really the performance of several acts at once, distinguished by different aspects of the speaker's intention: there is the act of saying something, what one does in saying it, such as requesting or promising, and how one is trying to affect one's audience"

https://www-jstor-org.proxyau.wrlc.org/stable/23936810 Nowhere in the text below is Wittgenstein cited, although others are.

Speech act theory hails from Wittgenstein's philosophical theories. Wittgenstein believed meaning derives from pragmatic tradition, demonstrating the importance of how language is used to accomplish objectives within specific situations. By following rules to accomplish a goal, communication becomes a set of language games. Thus, utterances do more than reflect a meaning, they are words designed to get things done

https://archive-pml.github.io/martin-lof/pdfs/Bibliopolis-Book-retypeset-1984.pdf Similar to the above, Per Martin-Löf's work is not cited here, though it is mentioned

Other attempts have been proposed by Per Martin-Löf for a treatment of the concept of assertion inside intuitionistic type theory...