User:2601:98A:4180:5D28:C428:E51C:A4B:2CB/Evaluate an Article

The article I evaluated is regarding a list of different academic fields in existence. The article was pretty straightforward and had a list of all the disciplines in the education fields, with detailed articles linked to each field for further reference and information. The article, however, is cited with sources that are from the early 2000s which shows that the information is somewhat outdated and needs to be updated with new and upcoming academic fields in today's world. They should also expand a bit more on how these academic fields and classified and and clustered under one department. In this way the reader would understand the authenticity of the information given and the process that went behind formulating it. The article seems to be neutral as there are no biased claims about the information being provided. Their opinion about there not being a proper way of classifying these fields is a bit over-presented in the article. Most of the citation links seem to be working. It is tough to find the specific references made in the article because most of the references came from books that need to be bought by viewers. They have also cited references to statistics formulated by the US government regarding classification of academic fields.

The chat page mostly consists of discussions regarding the update required in reference links, how there are other wiki articles based on the same topic and could be merged together and conflict of opinions regarding the difference between academic field of study and discipline. The article is rated list-class according to project quality scale. It is a part of/among the list articles in WikiProject.