User:2602:304:B361:690:1C89:2969:D594:A611/sandbox

Wikipedia Evaluations

1. Wikipedia Article: Credibility Each of the facts in this article are completely neutral with no bias perspectives. Each fact was represented with a reliable resource such as professional groups or organizations. There isn't much on the talk page. There is mostly just revisions or suggestions for other credibility articles. This article has 4 projects that it is involved in. They are all rated as a starting class but of high importance.

2. Wikipedia Essay: The Sexism of Wikipedia I learned that there are very few women on Wikipedia. They don't necessarily feel welcomed on the site and in some cases they feel harassed. There have been several instances when a women has tried to get the rate of women editors to increase, and then Wikipedia conveniently finds something wrong and doesn't allow them to do it anymore or even fires them. Also, Wikipedia has allowed some poorly choice of words be used in articles, which is very offensive to women. For example, when there is talk about a rape scene in a movie, Wikipedia found it more accurate to use "sex scene" instead of the word rape. However, women on Wikipedia now are trying to get more women on in a variety of ways.

3. Wikipedia Guideline: Neutral Point of View Something that surprised me about this guideline was that sometimes the bias part of an article can lye in the title. I thought that was interesting because that means even just a title can be bias, so you really have to pay attention to everything. If I had to describe this guideline in one sentence, I would say: Having a neutral point of view is essential in order to make it in the Wikipedia world.