User:2620:CC:8000:1C83:FC19:6B0D:D6B9:2D51/sandbox

The article, Digital Footprint, is very neutral based/ not biased. It meets some key elements and makes some relevant points, but overall, I feel there should have been more citations for each claim made. Adding more citations and even adding more claims throughout the article could really make this article stand out and become more factual. I found a source on UB Libraries, that could really add some more useful information to this piece. It is called, "Digital Footprint of Neurological Surgeons", by Christopher Kim.