User:2620:DF:8000:5703:0:2:29DE:9F75/sandbox

Article Evaluation

- Almost Everything in this article was relevant to the topic. The only parts that were not was the introduction and the ending. The ending distracted me a little bit because it was trying to be humorous but it mixed up what the author was trying to say. - The article for the most part was neutral but it did make certain claims about citations that were biased. - The viewpoints shown for the most part are well represented. - All but 2 links worked. Some of the sources did not match up with the article topic - All facts were referenced pretty appropriately except for the ending - Some of the information is outdated because every couple of years new rules come out - There was no conversations - Article talks about citations