User:2Fasttoofurious/Perdue Farms/Enelly23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

2Fasttoofurious/Perdue Farms


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:2Fasttoofurious/Perdue_Farms?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Perdue Farms

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, this article contribution is well written, organized, and has positively contributed to the original article. The tone is overall neutral and balanced, with equal representation of the topic at hand. Additionally, the sources are incorporated nicely and the article is clear, concise, and an easy read. However, some things to be aware of, are that you often stated they were criticized for multiple things, and I would be careful repeating that point too many times, as that may be viewed as opinion-based. I like how you added in their solution to their critiques and organized the contribution in a manner that flows nicely into your next point. I would maybe add a little more to the intro, for example adding in the major topics of your contribution and set up the rest of your writing a little better. But, the sources all look good, and meet the requirements listed above as well. While the writing may be geared to a more essay-like format I think it flows well and was written very well. Good job!