User:2NumForIce/Essays/IAR is not a loophole

The twelve words "" makes a difference for new editors—not everyone knows every single rule on Wikipedia, and Ignore all rules makes sure that people have a chance to learn from mistakes and not be excluded.

However, some editors and companies use IAR as a "loophole" to edit. An example is that some paid editing services use IAR as a "loophole" to bypass paid editing.

IAR is about common sense and good faith
We are not perfect, and neither are rules. IAR ensures that the spirit of the law takes precedence over the letter of the law. The letter of the law is only roughly the underlying spirit, which is one of the reasons IAR exists.

The thing is that, even though an edit doesn't comply with the wording of a rule, as long as the edit is made in good faith, common sense is used, and the point of the rule still gets across, IAR applies.

"Loopholes" encourage wikilawyering
"Wikilawyering" is a term