User:2ndReconCorpsman/Biological warfare/EEEpidemiologist Peer Review

General info
ReconCorpsman
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:2ndReconCorpsman/Biological warfare
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Biological warfare

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hey ReconCorpsman,

For your peer review I'm going to use the Biological Warfare article and offer suggestions where the article could be revised, strengthened, and edited.

Lead


 * The lead of this article does not demand many edits. It is efficiently worded with factual information and reliable sources. If you add information in the content I wouldn't suggest it necessary to modify the lead since it is fairly all encompassing.

Content


 * The content in the article is relevant to the topic, well rounded, and
 * The content is accurate to date.
 * There isn't a lot of information that is missing in this article from what I can tell.

Tone and Balance


 * The tone is neutral through the article.
 * The article has lots of hyperlinks that lead to other more specific articles. Maybe selecting one of those to revise might be beneficial since this article is relatively well written and has enough broad information.

Organization


 * See above notes about tone and balance.

Images and Media


 * All media in the article seems factually accurate and relevant.