User:3113N3113N/Humanitarian crisis/Htetnaingoo9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) = 3113N3113N


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:3113N3113N/Humanitarian_crisis/Htetnaingoo9_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Humanitarian crisis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The definition of Humanitarian crisis in this article is unambiguous, and it can be easy to understand for the readers. In that article, explaining the Categories is well to understand, but I would like to suggest that there should be more examples to understand these categories. I think that there is a very good explaining the impacts of the Humanitarian crisis, but in response to the humanitarian crisis, there would need to be more secondary sources. I think that that article is not biased, and that article is well written. The article should add more related images, which are well-captioned pictures. And few of the links are not working; they should be updated.